Mathis Bondaz vs Kian Vakili Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When considering second serve performance over the past six months, Vakili has a slight edge, securing 46.15% of points compared to Bondaz’s 36.07%.
• Analyzing return game stats, Vakili appears stronger, winning 51.21% of opponents' second serve points and 31.8% of first serve returns, surpassing Bondaz’s 29.17% and 25%, respectively.
• In pressure situations, both players exhibit similar resilience in saving breakpoints, with Vakili slightly more effective at 54.29% versus Bondaz's 53.13%.
• Over the last year, Bondaz has an equal win-loss record in matches played, whereas Vakili has a slightly negative record at 46.15% wins.
• Both players have their best win percent on hard surfaces, but Vakili performs marginally better with a 47% win rate on Hard compared to Bondaz’s 50% on Indoor Hard.
• In terms of tournament level, Bondaz has a 66.67% success rate in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events, outpacing Vakili who has managed a 46.15% win rate at the same event level.
• Bondaz has faced higher-ranked opponents over the last 12 months, with an average rank of 31.25 compared to Vakili's average opponent rank of 173.77.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Vakili might have the upper hand, winning 50% of deciding sets recently, while Bondaz has yet to secure a win in such situations.
• When it comes to break point conversion, Bondaz proves to be more efficient, converting 50% of opportunities, compared to Vakili's 38.18%.
• Considering their current event performance could provide additional insights, as some players excel in particular tournaments.

Editorial Prediction (August 5, 2025, UTC):

With regard to second serve proficiency and return game success, Vakili showcases a more robust performance than Bondaz. His superior stats in converting second serve points and successfully receiving his opponent’s serve indicate a potential advantage.

The ability of both players to withstand pressure situations appears comparable, albeit Vakili has a slight edge in breakpoint saving. Moreover, Vakili's history of winning deciding sets further enhances his prospects if the match extends beyond two sets.

Despite Bondaz's proficiency in converting break points and facing higher-ranked competitors over the past year, his win rate is parallel to his losses, suggesting a more inconsistent performance pattern compared to Vakili.

Given these comparative analyses, Vakili holds a slight advantage and is likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming match, assuming current performance trends continue.